John Edwards 2008: What’s not to like

February 21, 2007

Greatest Threat: Iran Acquires Nuclear Weapon

Filed under: AIPAC, Iran, Israel, flipping — is @ 5:19 pm
Columnist Peter Bart reports that Edwards told a Hollywood fundraiser last month that the possibility that Israel would bomb Iran’s nuclear facilities is perhaps the greatest short-term threat to world peace.

Edwards’ spokesman Jonathan Prince says the article is erroneous. He says Edwards says one of the greatest short-term threats to world peace is Iran acquiring a nuclear weapon.

Bart says Variety stands by its report. The host of the fundraiser, Adam Venit of the Endeavor talent agency, didn’t respond to a message seeking comment.

Associated Press 2/21/07
http://www.wwaytv3.com/node/501

January 22, 2007

Herzliya conference on “Israel’s national security”

Filed under: AIPAC, Iran, Israel — is @ 10:18 pm

It sounds like the stuff that conspiracy theories are made of. In a coastal resort near Tel Aviv, senior Israeli politicians and generals confer with top officials and politicians from Washington to discuss the threat of a nuclear Iran. In any good conspiracy theory, however, these talks would be going on in secret – preferably in an underground bunker. In fact the Herzliya conference on “Israel’s national security” is taking place perfectly openly in a smart hotel. And I am in the audience.

The Israel participation is, as one would expect, high level. The conference is scheduled to close with a speech from Ehud Olmert, the prime minister. The lunch-time speaker yesterday was Benjamin Netanyahu, the Likud leader, and maybe the next prime minister. We’re hearing from the foreign minister, the defence minister and a string of present and former generals.

But what has really struck me is the number of top Americans who have bothered to come over for the conference. The speaker at dinner last night was Gordon England, America’s deputy defence secretary; earlier in the day we heard from Nick Burns, the number three at the State Department. Several contenders for the presidency in 2008 have also felt obliged to tip their hat to Herzliya. Mitt Romney, who is probably second favourite for the Republican nomination, is turning up in person. John McCain, the GOP front-runner is appearing by satellite, so is Rudy Giuliani. For the Democrats, John Edwards is also scheduled to make a satellite address. I cannot think of any other country in the world that could summon up this level of American participation for a conference like this. Certainly not Britain.

Also well represented among the participants are well-known hawks like Richard Perle, Jim Woolsey (the former CIA director), Newt Gingrich and Jose Maria Aznar, the former Spanish prime minister. A lot of these chaps were very prominent in the drive to go to war in Iraq. Now, flushed by their undoubted success there, they are turning their attention to Iran.

There is no doubt that the war drums are beating pretty loudly here in Herzliya. The main topics of conversation that keep coming back and back – in the corridors and also in the conference hall – is how close is Iran to the bomb. Can anything short of military action stop the Iranians? If it comes to bombing, could the Israelis do it alone – or would they have to rely on the United States? Would President Bush give the order? (This place is full of people who claim to have spoken to somebody who has spoken to the president about this very issue, but they all seem to have different stories).

Financial Times 1/22/07
http://blogs.ft.com/rachmanblog/2007/01/israelis_americ.html#more

June 8, 2006

AIPAC trip

Filed under: AIPAC, Iran, Israel — is @ 1:05 am
“We cannot allow Iran to have nuclear weapons,” he declared, endorsing America’s current approach of working with the Europeans using diplomatic levers.

But he said the “carrots” on offer have to come with heavy pressure, such as “serious sanctions.”

In terms of the “stick” of military strikes, he said, “I would never take any option off the table.”

-snip

“Israel is in the unfortunate position of having to act without an agreement. I think American [officials] are supportive of that and want to be helpful in that effort - including me,” he said.

Those words were stronger than those used by President George W. Bush to assess the realignment plan during Olmert’s visit to the Oval Office last month.

“I would call them bold ideas. These ideas could lead to a two-state solution if a pathway to progress on the road map is not open in the period ahead,” Bush said at a press conference during the visit. “No party should prejudice the outcome of negotiations on a final status agreement, [but] the prime minister’s ideas could be an important step toward the peace we both support.”

-snip

Olmert, Foreign Minister Tzipi Livni, Defense Minister Amir Peretz and Internal Security Minister Avi Dichter were among the government officials who met with Edwards during his four-day trip, which ended Wednesday. His schedule also included meetings with Likud chairman Binyamin Netanyahu, Labor secretary-general Ephraim Sneh and former PA finance minister Salaam Fayad.

The visit, Edward’s second, included a helicopter tour surveying the route of the security barrier, the northern border and the Golan Heights.

“It gave a very physical sense of the threat the Israeli people face every day,” he said.

The trip was arranged by the American-Israel Education Foundation, an AIPAC sister organization. Each year the foundation hosts dozens of congressmen, presidential candidates, political consultants and other American political heavyweights.

Jerusalem Post, 6/8/06
http://www.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?cid=1149572637421&pagename=JPost%2FJPArticle%2FShowFull

July 22, 2004

Phase I: Faulty Foundation of Bush Administration’s Push for War

Senate Intelligence Committee Confirms Faulty Foundation of Bush Administration’s Push for War in Iraq

Under pressure from congressional Democrats last year, the Senate Intelligence Committee agreed to conduct an investigation of our government’s actions and statements on Iraq in the period before the start of the conflict there. However, rather than conduct a single comprehensive investigation of these issues, Intelligence Committee Chairman Roberts decided to split this inquiry into two phases. The Committee released the results of the first phase of its investigation on July 17, 2004. Entitled “U.S. Intelligence Community’s Prewar Intelligence Assessments On Iraq,” the Committee’s report concludes that the Bush Administration’s case for war with Iraq was dramatically overstated and largely inaccurate.

In their additional views to the report, Vice Chairman Rockefeller and Senators Levin and Durbin argue that phase one paints an incomplete picture of what occurred prior to the war and make a compelling case for the committee to quickly complete phase two - an analysis of the Administration’s use of this intelligence. According to these Senators, forceful public statements by senior Administration officials about the threat posed by Iraq created an intense climate of pressure on the intelligence community as it conducted its own analyses of these issues. This document presents key conclusions from the report and from the additional views submitted by Senators Rockefeller, Levin, and Durbin.

Democratic Policy Committee 7/22/04
http://democrats.senate.gov/dpc/dpc-new.cfm?doc_name=fs-108-2-210

Older Posts »

Blog at WordPress.com.